Friday, March 20, 2009
Judge Blocks Rule Permitting Concealed Guns In U.S. Parks
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, March 20, 2009; Page A09
The three groups that brought the suit -- the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees ..., So much for freedom in these United States...Click anywhere in the article to go to the full article in the Washington Post.
Environmental Impact??? Someone has got to be kidding...But the Judge says:
She noted that the government justified its decision to forgo an environmental analysis on the grounds that the rule does not "authorize" environmental impacts. Calling this a "tautology," she wrote that officials "abdicated their Congressionally-mandated obligation" to evaluate environmental impacts and "ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts" of the rule.
It won't be long until the anti-rights groups rule this land.
Friday, March 20, 2009; Page A09
The three groups that brought the suit -- the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees ..., So much for freedom in these United States...Click anywhere in the article to go to the full article in the Washington Post.
Environmental Impact??? Someone has got to be kidding...But the Judge says:
She noted that the government justified its decision to forgo an environmental analysis on the grounds that the rule does not "authorize" environmental impacts. Calling this a "tautology," she wrote that officials "abdicated their Congressionally-mandated obligation" to evaluate environmental impacts and "ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts" of the rule.
It won't be long until the anti-rights groups rule this land.